EZoFlash форум

translated by google translator
Hello Ezo

Programmer at the time I built EzoFlash 4v4

I need to work with a flash TSOP 56 (E28F320J3A)

I built the adapter TSOP56 B_1



Edit I found this to be done to the programmer

http://www.ezoflash.com/willem_info/for ... 1193775641

in practice

new 74hc04 and connect this pin :
pin2(add74hc04) to pin12 parallel port
pin4(add74hc04) to pin13 parallel port
pin1(add74hc04) to pin12 (IC6)
pin3(add74hc04) to pin2 (IC6)
cut connected pin10(IC1) to pin15(IC3)
and connect pin15(IC3) to pin2(IC5)
cut connected pin10(IC2) to pin15(IC2)
and connect pin15(IC2) to pin4(IC5)

I have not put the two resistors 10 K

The programmer is viewed by the software but on as device 0.98D8 Flash 16-bit LV / intel 28Fx00/28F320 J3



indicates the software I require 16-bit mode as Tsop56 adapter ID me 28F128J3



I read the flash, but I fail to verify that is read badly.



I tested the software 97D12C2 (Test)

but does not allow the choice of 16-bit Flash devices tsop56 LV / intel 28Fx00/28F320 J3

so I choose 16-bit Flash TSOP48 LV / intel 28Fx00/28F320 J3



and how to get ID




The Sw 0.97d12c3 inside is SW 0.97d12c2 (Test)

At this point I do not know what to do, help me?

Thank you

Hello

I need to work with a flash TSOP 56 (E28F320J3A)
I built the adapter TSOP56 B_1

8/16 bit adapter TSOP-56A1 is recomended to handle chips 28x00J3.
TSOP56B1 is not public adapter , link to it be somewhere. Adapter is functionally correct, unfortunately SW with 16bit 28Fxx0 J3 selected fail.
Adapter is working well with 28F016Sx, 28F160Sx
You can read results in chip testfile .

indicates the software I require 16-bit mode as Tsop56 adapter ID me 28F128J3

Oldest SW has wrong 28Fx00J3 ID name reference, ID is correct (0x16) , but name is assigned wrong. Latest SW has correct ID naming.

At this point I do not know what to do, help me?

Here is guide how to program 28F320J3 with tsop56b1
Appply SW 0.97d12c3 (4v4 hardware) or 0.98d12c3 (modified pcb45c hardware)
ezo4v4 jumpers -Jp2 (+3.6), Jp5
SW select 16bit 28F320J3
- check ID (0x0089 Intel, 0x0016 28F320J3)
- read chip (save if necessary)
Split source file in 2 x16Mb(2MB) blocks.
SW select 16bit 28F160B3B
- check ID
- erase
- blank check
- load first 16Mb block
- write/verify
Cut line from BUS pin34 to chip.
Connect chip side track via resistor 1k..4.7k to BUS pin 20 (Vcc), Vcc line is track up, next over line from BUS33.
- erase
- blank check
- load second 16Mb block
- write/verify
Remove resistor and restore track between BUS pin34 and chip.
SW select 16bit 28F320J3
- check ID
- load full 32Mb source file
- verify
Good luck !

Here is guide how to program 28F320J3 with tsop56b1
Appply SW 0.97d12c3 (4v4 hardware) or 0.98d12c3 (modified pcb45c hardware)
ezo4v4 jumpers -Jp2 (+3.6), Jp5
SW select 16bit 28F320J3
- check ID (0x0089 Intel, 0x0016 28F320J3)
- read chip (save if necessary)

read error
does not erase the chip

zip file attachment with differences in the reading software
098d8 and 097d12c2 (Test)

Fail content repeat in small blocks 0x00....0x7F (highest adress failure)
Check all programmer signals one by one in Test H/W mode. Follow section Guides.

Ezo писал(а):Fail content repeat in small blocks 0x00....0x7F (highest adress failure)
Check all programmer signals one by one in Test H/W mode. Follow section Guides.

I repeat for clarity the changes I made to the programmer is only this

in practice

new 74hc04 and connect this pin :
pin2(add74hc04) to pin12 parallel port
pin4(add74hc04) to pin13 parallel port
pin1(add74hc04) to pin12 (IC6)
pin3(add74hc04) to pin2 (IC6)
cut connected pin10(IC1) to pin15(IC3)
and connect pin15(IC3) to pin2(IC5)
cut connected pin10(IC2) to pin15(IC2)
and connect pin15(IC2) to pin4(IC5)

I have not put the two resistors 10 K

Now I run a small hardware test only on the connector BU4 CP 33/34/35/36/37

with SW 0.97d12c2 get
BU4 33/34/35/36 always 0 volts
on BU4 37 get with VDC-32 (on) and 1-Vpp (on) 11.73 with Vpp (off) 2.37 volts.

with SW 0.98D8 get as image


with SW 0.98d12c3 get


Continuous control of the programmer all the signals in Test H / W

I repeat for clarity the changes I made to the programmer is only this
in practice

Changes are OK

Now I run a small hardware test only on the connector BU4 CP 33/34/35/36/37
with SW 0.97d12c2 get

You have modified pcb45 hardware. Apply SW 0.98dxx (0.98d12c3)
Check all one by one signals in Test H/W , 0.98d12c3. Apply same reference table from guides.
Are you getting valid ID, SW 0.98d12c3, selected 16bit 28F160B3B ?

Check all programmer signals one by one in Test H/W modewith software 0.98D8, the result is as the following image, my measurements in red



during measurements IC8 / L7805 heats up too much, I burn my fingers to touch
I analyzed the programmer and see nn courts of any kind
some component missed?

during measurements IC8 / L7805 heats up too much, I burn my fingers to touch

Have a 50mA load longer time 7805 heats very well.
Jp2, Jp5 4.3V - here is result 4.15 and 1.5V . It is measured with load or without ?
Any 7805 heating without load ?
Are data , adress signals tested ?
Signal test pass - install adapter with chip.
Are you getting valid ID, SW 0.98d12c3, selected 16bit 28F160B3B ?
Before you reported valid ID. What settings applied - modified hw, sw, selected device ?

Jp2, Jp5 4.3V - here is result 4.15 and 1.5V . It is measured with load or without ?

no load, with load 100 ohm is result 4.15 and 0 Volt

Any 7805 heating without load ?

the programmer has some problems always warms the 7805, just connect the power, I tested to enable DC-32 and OE-24 (to enable access to additional ... .. D7 D0), D0-13 on and off, and then measure control the change of logic level of BU1/11, IC7 / 8, IC7 / 9, BU1 / 2. getting on IC7 / 8 always zero volts and IC7 / 9 measure 4.86 and 2.16 volts
on collector V2 (V2K) I have 5 volts
of IC9 / 78L12 I have 12 volt

I try to replace the V3 BC547? or the IC7/74HC04?

help

Are data , adress signals tested ?

I tested all the signals as a guide, see top image

Are you getting valid ID, SW 0.98d12c3, selected 16bit 28F160B3B ?

with SW 0.98d12c3 I never got a valid ID

Before you reported valid ID. What settings applied - modified hw, sw, selected device ?

system the programmer and continuous tests

the programmer has some problems always warms the 7805, just connect the power

Extra 74hc04 is correctly powered ? When 7805 started warming ?
Check any shorts possible done in modify process.

I try to replace the V3 BC547?

why ? transistor is not taking power

with SW 0.98d12c3 I never got a valid ID

what sw version reply valid ID, with or without modify ?

Extra 74hc04 is correctly powered ? When 7805 started warming ?

it is correctly powered.
of all logic, there are +5.0 volts, from IC1 to IC6 (Vcc pin 16) and IC7 (Pin 14), well out of the 7805 and 78L12 are OK.
started warming after all measurements as a guide.

why not change the logic level of IC7 / 8 and remains at logic state zero? help

Check any shorts possible done in modify process.

no shorts done in modify process, the change is made ​​for a long time and the programmer has always worked.

what sw version reply valid ID, with or without modify ?

When started this discussion was already modified by the programmer time, so all the tests done were carried out precisely with programmer modified

a valid ID get it with SW 0.98d8; 0.97d12c2 but NOT with SW 0.98d12C3

started warming after all measurements as a guide.

Usually shorts.

why not change the logic level of IC7 / 8 and remains at logic state zero? help

Set Jp1, Jp3. Go Test H/W. Activate 32-Vcc
Measure V2k (+5), IC7/9 (+5V), IC7/8 (0)
Keep Vcc, activate OE and D0. Measure on R5 (+5) , V1b (+0.6), V1k and IC7/9 (0), IC7/8 (+5).
Report differencies.
Here, if V1k >1V - change V1 BC547
if both IC7/9 and IC7/8 (~0V), check shorts from IC7/8 to BU1/11 Busy. Change 74HC04.

replaced the 74HC04 and Hardware present, all ok

TEST

chip SST 39VF020 Jumper 1, 3, 5 (and then also tried, jumper 2, 5 as in chip-test file)
SW 0.98D8, selected device SST29VF020, ID, reading and verification is OK
SW 0.97D12C3 and 0.98D12C3, selected device SST29LF/VF020 and I get bad electronics ID
see image below


Chip AT29C512 Jumper 1, 3, 5

SW 0.98D8, selected device AT29C512, ID, reading and verification is OK
SW 0.97D12C3 and 0.98D12C3, selected device AT29C512 and I get bad electronics ID
see image below


continuous

0.97d12c3 is not compatible with modified hardware, don't use it.
Strange that same chip AT29C512 is OK with 0.98d8 , but fail with 0.98d12c3
Generally 0.98d12c3 and some other 0.98dxxx SW requires usage of 4021 instead of 4014.
I checked AT29C512 and get valid ID with both SW 0.98d8 and 0.98d12c3, I changed 4021 to 4014 in ezoflash4v5 and again both SW returns valid ID. Can't explain.
Do you have programmer logic on sockets or soldered in board ?
--------------------------
Check added IC 74HC04 for connections from 4014 to DB25. Replace chip.
Note, softwares 0.98d2, 0.98d6, 0.98d8, PCB45(0.98d9) don't apply multiple data outputs from 4021(4014).
Software versions 0.98d5, PCB45-1(0.98d9), 0.98d11, 0.98d12, 0.98d12c3 apply multiple data outputs.

Are you getting valid ID, SW 0.98d12c3, selected 16bit 28F160B3B ?
Before you reported valid ID. What settings applied - modified hw, sw, selected device ?

0.97d12c3 is not compatible with modified hardware, don't use it.

My answer to both questions
sorry if embedded with the software, but I see it as in the image below,
Adapter TSOP 56B1selected device 28F160B3B
only 98D12C3 responds with the bad id, the 98D8 except the name respond with valid id, the 97D12C3 respond with valid id and valid name.

Do you have programmer logic on sockets or soldered in board ?

logic on sockets

Check added IC 74HC04 for connections from 4014 to DB25

the connections are ok

Check added IC 74HC04 for connections from 4014 to DB25. Replace chip.
Note, softwares 0.98d2, 0.98d6, 0.98d8, PCB45(0.98d9) don't apply multiple data outputs from 4021(4014).
Software versions 0.98d5, PCB45-1(0.98d9), 0.98d11, 0.98d12, 0.98d12c3 apply multiple data outputs.

I have to change the 4014 with 4021?

chip ASD AE29F2008 Jumper 1, 3, 5
SW 0.98D8, selected device ASD AE29F2008, ID, reading and verification is OK
SW 0.98D12C3, selected device ASD AE29F2008 and I get bad electronics ID
see image below



Note:

I add that on my windows program I read

PCB5.0C Eprom (0.98D8)

Willem Eprom (97D12C3) Test-

Willem Eprom (98D12C3) Test-

perhaps I have the correct version of the program! ! !